<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Site Monitoring Tool Built</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.talkd.com/site-monitoring-tool-built/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.talkd.com/site-monitoring-tool-built/</link>
	<description>Adventures in Web Development</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phillip E.</title>
		<link>http://www.talkd.com/site-monitoring-tool-built/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 07:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://d32147.u40.imountain.com/?p=168#comment-26</guid>
		<description>We went through much the same as what you are and decided that tha amount of work required and continuous tweaks would be a headache. We ultimately decided to go with SiteNurse (http://www.sitenurse.com) to have 3 websites (http or https or ports) monitored for about $4 per month. Based on what my technical team is paid, it made more fiscal sense. Just my 2 cents...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We went through much the same as what you are and decided that tha amount of work required and continuous tweaks would be a headache. We ultimately decided to go with SiteNurse (http://www.sitenurse.com) to have 3 websites (http or https or ports) monitored for about $4 per month. Based on what my technical team is paid, it made more fiscal sense. Just my 2 cents&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
